The Solution: Modernizing the
Presidential Public Funding System
The presidential public funding system worked well for nearly a quarter
century by leveling the playing field through limits on the amount that
presidential candidates could spend on their campaigns.
Between the initiation of the system in 1976 and 1996, each winning
candidate participated in the system both in the primaries and the general
election. In the five elections featuring incumbent presidents in that
timespan, challengers won three.
While its effectiveness has waned since 2000, when George W. Bush began
a trend of major candidates opting out of the system for the primary
season, the presidential public funding system can, and should, be fixed.
Nearly three-fourths (74 percent) of those surveyed in a June 2006 poll
said they supported a proposal for voluntary public funding of federal
elections,[1] showing
that Americans are not ready to let the system disappear.
This desire for federal elected officials who are not beholden to
special interests extends beyond the office of president to Congress.
In March of 2007, Sens. Richard
Durbin and Arlen
Specter introduced S.
1285, the Fair Elections Now Act, which would create a voluntary
system of full public funding for Congressional elections. To learn
more about Fair Elections, click here.
In order to reinvigorate the presidential public financing system,
funding needs to be available earlier in the campaign season, and in
amounts that allow candidates to stay competitive with non-participating
opponents. To fix these problems, as well as others, Sens. Russ
Feingold (D-Wis.) and Susan
Collins (R-Maine) and Reps. David
Price (D-N.C.) and Christopher
Shays (R-Conn.) introduced bills in the 110th Congress to reform
the system. Known as the Presidential
Public Funding Act of 2007, these companion bills would not go into
effect until after the 2008 election.The bills would accomplish
the reforms described below.
Reforms of the Primary Elections System
-
Increases from 1:1 to 4:1 the public funds match of the first
$200 of an individual’s total contribution to a primary candidate.
-
Eliminates the state-by-state primary spending limits and increases
the overall primary spending limit from its current level of approximately
$45 million up to $100 million before April 1of the election year
and up to a total of $150 million for candidates who choose to participate
by the end of the presidential primary period. The limits are
indexed for inflation.
-
Requires that to qualify for public financing in the primary election,
a candidate must raise $25,000 in each of 20 states, in amounts of
no more than $200 from any individual.
-
Requires a candidate to commit to accepting public financing for
the general election in order to receive public funds in the primary
election.
-
Moves the starting date for the payment of public funds to primary
candidates from January 1 of the election year to July 1 of the year
immediately preceding the presidential election year.
-
Provides that if a candidate who is not participating in the public
financing system raises or spends more than 20% more than a primary
spending limit, the spending limit for all of the participating candidates
of that party is increased by $50 million, indexed for inflation.
An additional 1:1 match of eligible contributions will also be made
available to all participating candidates.
Reforms of the General Election System
-
Sets the spending limit for participating general election candidates
at $100 million, an increase from the current level of approximately
$75 million. The limits are indexed for inflation.
-
Requires a candidate to qualify for and receive public financing
in the primary election in order to be eligible to receive it in the
general election.
-
Provides that if a non-participating candidate in the general election
raises or spends more than 20% above the combined primary and general
election spending limits, the public funds grant provided to a participating
candidate in the general election is doubled, to a total of $200 million,
indexed for inflation.
-
Increases the limit for coordinated spending by a national party
on behalf of its presidential candidate from approximately $15 million
to $25 million between April 1 and the nominating convention and an
additional $25 million after a candidate is nominated, indexed for
inflation. This is to provide for candidate support between the primary
election and the first Monday in September of the election year, when
general election public funds are finally released.
-
Increases the amount of the voluntary check-off on the tax return
form to fund the public financing system from $3 to $10 for an individual
and from $6 to $20 for a married couple.
-
Requires the Secretary of the Treasury to issue regulations to
ensure that electronic software used in the preparation or filing
of individual tax returns not automatically accept or decline a check-off
of taxpayer funds to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund.
-
Requires presidential candidates to disclose bundled contributions
-
Prohibits the political parties from spending soft money on their
conventions.
Sources: S. 2412 by Sens. Feingold and Collins, and H.R. 4294 by Reps.
Price and Shays.
[1]Celinda
Lake, et. al., National Survey on Campaign Finance Reform,” Lake
Research Partners and Bellwether Research, June 21, 2006.